Relatives' Heartache Regarding Coastal Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.